Metaview Pricing: Metaview Sourcing, Notetaker and Application Review Cost per User

Metaview's pricing page opens with a promise: "Pick what you need. Pay for what you use." It then splits the product into four tabs, Sourcing, Application Review, Notetaker and All agents, and each tab carries its own plans. Every user gets access to the platform, but you pay only for the agents you switch on. That is a genuinely different model from the seat-based recruiting platforms, and it is the reason Metaview is hard to price from a summary.

Sourcing and Notetaker are priced per user, per month. Application Review is priced on volume with unlimited users, which is the right unit for an agent that reads inbound applications: the work scales with applicants, not with recruiters. The fourth tab, All agents, has no cards at all. It points to the Agentic Recruiting Platform, a custom quote for the whole suite.

No tab on the page shows an annual price or an annual discount. Everything is expressed monthly. If you are offered an annual rate, it came from a sales conversation, which is worth knowing before you compare Metaview with vendors like Loxo or SeekOut that publish annual prices paid up front.

Search for Metaview pricing and the third-party pages disagree with each other and with Metaview. One widely repeated version lists Free, Pro at $50 per user a month and Enterprise. Another says Notetaker starts around $20 per user. Neither figure is on Metaview's page. Notetaker Pro is $60, Sourcing Pro is $100 and Sourcing Max is $300.

Part of the confusion is technical, and it is the kind of detail that decides what AI assistants tell buyers. The structured data Metaview publishes for search engines describes one catalog with four offers: Free at $0, Pro at $100, Max at $300 and Enterprise. Those are the Sourcing prices only. The Notetaker and Application Review plans are rendered by JavaScript after the page loads, so a crawler that reads the static page, or a summary tool that reads only the first tab, sees Sourcing and reports it as the whole of Metaview pricing.

We read the plan definitions from Metaview's own page code, which is where the Application Review slider gets its six price points. If you are building a budget, use those numbers and check them against metaview.ai/pricing on the day you sign. That is the same method behind our Crelate pricing breakdown, where the page data held two prices the plan cards never showed.

The Sourcing agent searches for candidates in the background once a role is set up. Metaview builds an Ideal Candidate Profile from the job description and refines it from your feedback, and its FAQ gives the example of the agent starting a search automatically after an intake call. Free covers the first 100 profiles sourced. Pro is $100 per user a month for 200 profiles a month. Max is $300 per user a month with no limit. Both paid plans allow infinite concurrent searches.

The number that matters is cost per sourced profile. Pro works out to 50 cents a profile at full use. Max is flat, so its cost per profile falls as volume rises, and it only matches Pro's 50 cents at 600 profiles a month. The page lists no overage rate for Pro, so a desk that needs 250 or 400 profiles has no middle option: it is choosing between 200 profiles for $100 and unlimited for $300.

The pricing page does not say whether a sourced profile includes verified contact details, so do not compare it one for one with a contact credit. A Juicebox contact credit is a revealed email or phone number, and Juicebox Starter includes 500 of them for $99 a seat on annual billing. Ask Metaview during the free tier what a sourced profile contains and how outreach reaches the candidate.

Application Review screens inbound applicants against the role. Free covers 50 applications a month with basic screening. Pro adds what Metaview calls advanced AI evaluation and unlimited users, and it is priced by monthly review volume on a six-step slider: $150 for 500 reviews, $300 for 1,000, $1,450 for 5,000, $2,800 for 10,000, $13,000 for 50,000 and $25,000 for 100,000. Pro is sold through a demo rather than a sign-up button.

Divide each step and the unit price barely moves: 30 cents a review at 500 and 1,000, 29 cents at 5,000, 28 cents at 10,000, 26 cents at 50,000 and 25 cents at 100,000. For a US team hiring hourly or high-volume roles, that makes the budget easy to predict. It also means you pay for every applicant the agent reads, including the ones a knockout question would have filtered for free, so clean up your application form before you size the tier.

If your pipeline is mostly inbound, compare this with tools priced per role or per seat. Our guide to candidate screening software covers the other pricing models, and high volume recruiting software covers the teams where per-review pricing adds up fastest.

Notetaker is the product Metaview is best known for. It records and summarizes interviews and pushes notes into the ATS. Free covers 25 calls a month with basic transcription. Pro is $60 per user a month for unlimited calls and priority processing. Metaview's FAQ says assistant questions and note regenerations are included, with no credits and no usage limits, and that Reports is a separate add-on billed as a flat fee.

For a recruiter running three or four screens a day, $60 is a fair price, and it is the one Metaview agent with no real equivalent in a sourcing tool. HireAgent does not transcribe interviews. If notetaking is the main job you are hiring software for, Notetaker Pro is a sensible buy on its own, and nothing about it stops you running a different tool for sourcing and screening.

Metaview suits an in-house talent team on Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, Gem or SmartRecruiters, which are the integrations its FAQ names, that wants to buy AI one job at a time. Starting with Notetaker and adding Sourcing later is a real advantage over platforms that sell everything in one seat. The free tier on each agent also lets you test on a live role before a card is involved.

The case against is arithmetic. Stack three agents for a team and the monthly bill passes a single-price platform quickly, and the Pro sourcing ceiling pushes any busy desk to $300 a seat. The pieces a buyer most wants priced for a hiring workflow, outreach and screening beyond applications, are only in the custom platform quote.

That is where HireAgent fits. One plan sources candidates against your criteria, screens and ranks them into an explainable shortlist with the evidence attached, drafts personalized outreach and books interviews, with candidate consent and AI disclosure, and a human makes every hiring decision. Plans are $299 a month for one seat and up to 3 roles, $799 for three seats, up to 10 roles and ATS integration, and $1,999 for ten seats with high sourcing volume. If you are still choosing a sourcing layer, our AI sourcing software guide and AI recruiting software pricing survey put Metaview's rivals side by side.

What does a sourced profile include? The page counts profiles, not contacts. Ask whether an email or phone number comes with each one, and what outreach costs if it does not.

What happens at profile 201 on Pro? No overage rate is published. Ask whether you can buy a block of profiles or whether the only path is Max at $300.

Is there an annual rate? Every price on the page is monthly. If you commit for a year, get the discount and the renewal terms in writing.

What do Reports, Screening and Outreach cost? None of them has a public price. Put them in the same proposal as the seats, so you are comparing a complete number with other vendors.